And so we reach the end. In designing this summary of learning, I decided to practice an assessment that I would like to utilize with my students in the future: a song parody.
I chose the song Let It Be by the Beatles for two reasons: #1, the chord progression and key is simple and easy to experiment with, and #2 it is one of my favourite songs of all time so it just made sense. I used the karaoke version for ease, and I used Audacity and Bandlab for editing. For this summary and in this post you will find the following:
- A link to the soundcloud audio of me singing my version of “ECI 833 – Foundational Technology”.
- A breakdown of how the lyrics offer insight into what I have learned in this course.
- Lastly, a small snippet to offer insight into how I intend to incorporate what I have learned into the future and into my classroom.
The Song
The Lyrics
ECI 833,
let’s talk tecnology
start with the beginning:
Productivity
Docs, drive, sheets, a form,
Word excel, powerpoint,
Are we more productive?
Who can tell?
ECI, 833,
foundational history,
Jump to the theory,
Intro to EdTech
Postman asks us
What is lost
in our advancement
What’s the cost?
We lose part of culture,
But the future pushes through
Connectivism keeps it right,
Knowledge is a fluid fight
Online space: connections
They are made
ECI, 833,
foundational history,
Assessment and the web
One two three (x2)
Collaboration through the 2.0,
Stop and pause, ask who’s who
Essentialism gone,
Constructivist stand tall
3.0 next in flight,
Soon we’ll self direct our own lives,
We can learn as we go,
Coming soon to you
Can you see?
Can you see?
All the possibilities,
Flip grid, quizziz, Kahoot
But be careful, yes indeed,
Free is never really free,
Class Dojo and it’s
Pavolvian techniques
ECI 833
discuss accessibility
Universal design
Is a must (2 chorus)
Right to education, right to learn
As we need
Stopping ableist oppression
Teachers proceed
The world is ever-changing,
we know it’s only right to say
Inclusion is a framework
We all deserve
Power and privilege – just consider
Who gets honoured in our world
We must decide
The story we tell
ECI 833,
maker spaces,
Inventor story
The world is always changing
So are we.
ECI 833
We’ve just started the journey
More to come tomorrow,
Tech is always growing
ECI 833,
Learn the foundations
and you’ll see,
You can be most any
Teacher you choose to be
Breakdown and Notes
I wanted to structure my song in the same format that the course was structured, so that the song grew alongside the content I was consuming. Thus, the song is written in primarily chronological order following the content that we discussed as a class.
The first few verses discuss the purpose of productivity suites and offers insight into the purpose of technolgoy as a whole. I ask a few questions that I have been debating since the onset of this course:
- Are we really more productive? The use of productivity suits boasts that its purpose is to assist in the creation of content, streamline pen and paper based activities, and offer collaboration on a far grander scale. There are other benefits, but you get the general idea: Online productivity tech > paper based technology. But how do we measure productivity? Financial success? I think we cling to economic possibility of productivity because it appeals to our capitalist side. It’s difficult to take a breath away from being productive when lack of productivity leads to a stalemate in social class and economic development. This walks hand in hand for me with the idea that we are losing our mindfulness and substituting it with the constant race to accumulate more and more.
- The second question that concerns me was something that arose from our initial class and the readings that followed: what do we lose in the advancement of technology? Postman discusses how there is always an element of culture that slips to the wayside when technology takes its place and now that I know this it becomes irresponsible for an educator to not ask themselves what culture are they empowering through their assessment techniques. We live in an era where we are called to action for postcolonial narratives to empower and revitalize our marginalized voices. Truth and Reconciliation demands that we acknowledge Indigenous Ways of Knowing and stop only honouring the colonizer methods of truth-making. If we want to move toward a narrative of post-colonization, we must actively create methods of representing that honour Indigenous Ways of Knowing. As we become more “productive”, something has to be left at the wayside and I would argue that educators can be at the forefront of choosing what we let go and what we fiercely hold on to.
- “Knowledge is fluid” and this is both a reference to the concept of the web 3.0 and the learning theories that we touched on. The postmodern foundational belief of truth as subjective and knowledge as an inauthentic experience has reverberated into our online spaces – what we know is constantly being updated/verified/challenged across multiple sources. As our world becomes a hybrid experience between the physical and virtual realms, so too must we acknowledge and accept that knowledge is no longer static.
- The theory of connectivism was a new one for me, and perhaps one should consider it more of an additional limb to the body of work that we are already doing in our instructional approach. It is clear that as our online spaces become more developed and we move toward heutagogy focused curriculum (if we can design it) then we will need to embrace the epistemological framework of connectivism. This was highlighted in our presentation that focused on the evolution of online classes and how they have been utilized.
The next section of the song continues to discuss the evolution of the internet and acknowledges that essentialism is a way of the past and that in this era it is constructivism that occupies and controls the pedagogical reins. Moving onto assessment, power, and accessibility a few other points are made:
- “All the possibilities” – a reference to our second week of presentations wherein we discussed all the possible options for digital formative assessment. To say that there is a plethora of options is an understatement, but it is important to acknowledge that quantity and quality are not always the same thing. The formative options that are out there require exploration and experimentation to see if they can really be personalized to the extend that you need and if they will be worth the cost.
- Speaking of cost, one of the key pieces of discussion that I will be walking away with from the presentation on digital assessment is the Pavlovian undertones of ClassDojo. We have a teacher in our building who religiously practices it so I look forward to speaking with her about how she uses it and what it looks like in her classroom.
- Although I was aware of universal design before this class, I have been struggling with the notion of inclusivity and in the song I say “Inclusion is a framework / we all deserve”. Inclusivity is incredibly important to the plight of education, but I struggle to find a static definition of what inclusivity is beyond “everyone is included” – there are too many questions left unanswered in this definition: Included in what? Curriculum? General behaviour? School activities? Probably a blend of all those things is the answer, but the purpose remains vague. For me and through my work presenting on the power dynamics behind accessible/assistive tech, I would say that the purpose of inclusivity is to “stop ableist oppression” and to consider the “story we tell”. As educators, we can disencourage the notion that disability equates to an inability to learn – we just have to find the right devices to assist in the restructuring of that narrative.
In the final section of the song, I move toward looking at the future and consider the implications for both myself and the possibilities of those other educators who are exploring the field of ed tech.
- Maker spaces: an allusion to our final class where we discussed what a maker space in a classroom could look like and how we incorporate the ideas of Seymour Papert and the notion of creating experiences with content that enliven individuals and create opportunities for space and for new stories of exploration and invention to come into existence.
- Ultimately, the social milieu of teaching and the phenomenological awareness of what we hold onto shifts because our world is changing. Thus, it is if the educator accepts the volatile nature of technology and its possibilities then they will be able to adopt the foundations of this course and use it to create a living, enriched, adaptitive, and meaningful course of instruction – whatever that may look like.
Looking Forward
I appreciate this class in that it opens up broader areas of inquiry to consider in my daily pedagogical life. I need to remember to ask myself about the authenticity of my digital assessments, question who inherits power through my assessment practice, plan for the evolution of our virtual world in order to ready the citizens that will need to navigate through it, and never forget to embrace how vital the practice of the constant learner is in our education profession.
In addition to the thoughts I have already shared, I intend to have my students create song parodies to illustrate their learning in the future, and this was a fun way to step into how to troubleshoot what will go wrong with those assignments. I plan to bring forward the theory of connectivism to my staff as build our locally developed digital citizenship curriculum, and I plan to incorporate more of Seymour Papert’s theories in relation to my math classes.
Thank you for following in this journey.